Pharmacotherapeutic group: Medicinal products for treatment of bone diseases, bisphosphonates, ATC code: M05BA06
Mechanism of action
Ibandronic acid is a highly potent bisphosphonate belonging to the nitrogen-containing group of bisphosphonates, which act selectively on bone tissue and specifically inhibit osteoclast activity without directly affecting bone formation. It does not interfere with osteoclast recruitment. Ibandronic acid leads to progressive net gains in bone mass and a decreased incidence of fractures through the reduction of elevated bone turnover towards premenopausal levels in postmenopausal women.
Pharmacodynamic effects
The pharmacodynamic action of ibandronic acid is inhibition of bone resorption. In vivo, ibandronic acid prevents experimentally induced bone destruction caused by cessation of gonadal function, retinoids, tumours or tumour extracts. In young (fast growing) rats, the endogenous bone resorption is also inhibited, leading to increased normal bone mass compared with untreated animals. Animal models confirm that ibandronic acid is a highly potent inhibitor of osteoclastic activity. In growing rats, there was no evidence of impaired mineralisation even at doses greater than 5,000 times the dose required for osteoporosis treatment.
Both daily and intermittent (with prolonged dose-free intervals) long-term administration in rats, dogs and monkeys was associated with formation of new bone of normal quality and maintained or increased mechanical strength even at doses in the toxic range. In humans, the efficacy of both daily and intermittent administration with a dose-free interval of 9-10weeks of ibandronic acid was confirmed in a clinical trial (MF 4411), in which ibandronic acid demonstrated anti-fracture efficacy.
In animal models ibandronic acid produced biochemical changes indicative of dose- dependent inhibition of bone resorption, including suppression of urinary biochemical markers of bone collagen degradation (such as deoxypyridinoline, and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX)).
In a Phase 1 bioequivalence study conducted in 72 postmenopausal women receiving 150mg orally every 28days for a total of four doses, inhibition in serum CTX following the first dose was seen as early as 24hours post-dose (median inhibition 28%), with median maximal inhibition (69%) seen 6days later. Following the third and fourth dose, the median maximum inhibition 6days post dose was 74% with reduction to a median inhibition of 56% seen 28days following the fourth dose. With no further dosing, there is a loss of suppression of biochemical markers of bone resorption.
Clinical efficacy
Independent risk factors, for example, low BMD, age, the existence of previous fractures, a family history of fractures, high bone turnover and low body mass index should be considered in order to identify women at increased risk of osteoporotic fractures.
Ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly
Bone mineral density (BMD)
Ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly was shown to be at least as effective as ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily at increasing BMD in a two year, double-blind, multicentre study (BM 16549) of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (lumbar spine BMD T score below -2.5 SD at baseline). This was demonstrated in both the primary analysis at one year and in the confirmatory analysis at two years endpoint (Table 2).
Table 2: Mean relative change from baseline of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck and trochanter BMD after one year (primary analysis) and two years of treatment (Per-Protocol Population) in study BM 16549.
|
|
One year data in study BM 16549 |
Two year data in study BM 16549 |
|
Mean relative changes from baseline %
[95% CI] |
ibandronic acid
2.5mg daily (N=318) |
ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly
(N=320) |
ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily
(N=294) |
ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly
(N=291) |
|
Lumbar spine L2-L4 BMD |
3.9 [3.4, 4.3] |
4.9 [4.4, 5.3] |
5.0 [4.4, 5.5] |
6.6 [6.0, 7.1] |
|
Total hip BMD |
2.0 [1.7, 2.3] |
3.1 [2.8, 3.4] |
2.5 [2.1, 2.9] |
4.2 [3.8, 4.5] |
|
Femoral neck BMD |
1.7 [1.3, 2.1] |
2.2 [1.9, 2.6] |
1.9 [1.4, 2.4] |
3.1 [2.7, 3.6] |
|
Trochanter BMD |
3.2 [2.8, 3.7] |
4.6 [4.2, 5.1] |
4.0 [3.5, 4.5] |
6.2 [5.7, 6.7] |
Furthermore, ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly was proven superior to ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily for increases in lumbar spine BMD in a prospectively planned analysis at one year, p=0.002, and at two years, p<0.001.
At one year (primary analysis), 91.3% (p=0.005) of patients receiving ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly had a lumbar spine BMD increase above or equal to baseline (BMD responders), compared with 84.0% of patients receiving ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily. At two years, 93.5% (p=0.004) and 86.4% of patients receiving ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly or ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily, respectively, were responders.
For total hip BMD, 90.0% (p<0.001) of patients receiving ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly and 76.7% of patients receiving ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily had total hip BMD increases above or equal to baseline at one year. At two years 93.4% (p<0.001) of patients receiving ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly and 78.4%, of patients receiving ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily had total hip BMD increases above or equal to baseline.
When a more stringent criterion is considered, which combines both lumbar spine and total hip BMD, 83.9% (p<0.001) and 65.7% of patients receiving ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly or ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily, respectively, were responders at one year. At two years, 87.1% (p<0.001) and 70.5% of patients met this criterion in the 150mg monthly and 2.5mg daily arms respectively.
Biochemical markers of bone turn-over
Clinically meaningful reductions in serum CTX levels were observed at all time points measured, i.e. months 3, 6, 12 and 24. After one year (primary analysis) the median relative change from baseline was -76% for ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly and -67% for ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily. At two years the median relative change was -68% and -62%, in the 150mg monthly and 2.5mg daily arms respectively.
At one year, 83.5% (p= 0.006) of patients receiving ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly and 73.9% of patients receiving ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily were identified as responders (defined as a decrease ≥50% from baseline). At two years 78.7% (p=0.002) and 65.6% of patients were identified as responders in the 150mg monthly and 2.5mg daily arms respectively.
Based on the results of study BM 16549, ibandronic acid 150mg once monthly is expected to be at least as effective in preventing fractures as ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily.
Ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily
In the initial three-year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fracture study (MF 4411), a statistically significant and medically relevant decrease in the incidence of new radiographic morphometric and clinical vertebral fractures was demonstrated (table 3). In this study, ibandronic acid was evaluated at oral doses of 2.5mg daily and 20mg intermittently as an exploratory regimen. Ibandronic acid was taken 60 minutes before the first food or drink of the day (post-dose fasting period). The study enrolled women aged 55 to 80 years, who were at least 5 years postmenopausal, who had a BMD at lumbar spine of 2 to 5 SD below the premenopausal mean (T-score) in at least one vertebra [L1-L4], and who had one to four prevalent vertebral fractures. All patients received 500mg calcium and 400 IU vitamin D daily. Efficacy was evaluated in 2,928 patients. Ibandronic acid 2.5mg administered daily, showed a statistically significant and medically relevant reduction in the incidence of new vertebral fractures. This regimen reduced the occurrence of new radiographic vertebral fractures by 62% (p=0.0001) over the three year duration of the study. A relative risk reduction of 61% was observed after 2 years (p=0.0006). No statistically significant difference was attained after 1 year of treatment (p=0.056). The anti-fracture effect was consistent over the duration of the study. There was no indication of a waning of the effect over time.
The incidence of clinical vertebral fractures was also significantly reduced by 49% (p=0.011). The strong effect on vertebral fractures was furthermore reflected by a statistically significant reduction of height loss compared to placebo (p<0.0001).
Table 3: Results from 3 years fracture study MF 4411 (%, 95% CI)
|
|
Placebo
(N=974) |
ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily (N=977) |
|
Relative Risk Reduction New morphometric vertebral fractures |
|
62% (40.9, 75.1) |
|
Incidence of new morphometric vertebral fractures |
9.56% (7.5, 11.7) |
4.68% (3.2, 6.2) |
|
Relative risk reduction of clinical vertebral fracture |
|
49% (14.03, 69.49) |
|
Incidence of clinical vertebral fracture |
5.33% (3.73, 6.92) |
2.75% (1.61, 3.89) |
|
BMD - mean change relative to baseline lumbar spine at year 3 |
1.26% (0.8, 1.7) |
6.54% (6.1, 7.0) |
|
BMD - mean change relative to baseline total hip at year 3 |
-0.69% (-1.0, -0.4) |
3.36% (3.0, 3.7) |
The treatment effect of ibandronic acid was further assessed in an analysis of the subpopulation of patients who at baseline had a lumbar spine BMD T-score below -2.5. The vertebral fracture risk reduction was very consistent with that seen in the overall population.
Table 4: Results from 3 years fracture study MF 4411 (%, 95% CI) for patients with lumbar spine BMD T-score below -2.5 at baseline
|
|
Placebo
(N=587) |
ibandronic acid 2.5mg daily (N=575) |
|
Relative Risk Reduction New morphometric vertebral fractures |
|
59% (34.5, 74.3) |
|
Incidence of new morphometric vertebral fractures |
12.54% (9.53, 15.55) |
5.36% (3.31, 7.41) |
|
Relative risk reduction of clinical vertebral fracture |
|
50% (9.49, 71.91) |
|
Incidence of clinical vertebral fracture |
6.97% (4.67, 9.27) |
3.57% (1.89, 5.24) |
|
BMD - mean change relative to baseline lumbar spine at year 3 |
1.13% (0.6, 1.7) |
7.01% (6.5, 7.6) |
|
BMD - mean change relative to baseline total hip at year 3 |
-0.70% (-1.1, -0.2) |
3.59% (3.1, 4.1) |
In the overall patient population of the study MF4411, no reduction was observed for non-vertebral fractures, however daily ibandronic acid appeared to be effective in a high-risk subpopulation (femoral neck BMD T-score <-3.0), where a non-vertebral fracture risk reduction of 69% was observed.
Daily treatment with 2.5mg resulted in progressive increases in BMD at vertebral and nonvertebral sites of the skeleton.
Three-year lumbar spine BMD increase compared to placebo was 5.3% and 6.5% compared to baseline. Increases at the hip compared to baseline were 2.8% at the femoral neck, 3.4% at the total hip, and 5.5% at the trochanter.
Biochemical markers of bone turnover (such as urinary CTX and serum Osteocalcin) showed the expected pattern of suppression to premenopausal levels and reached maximum suppression within a period of 3-6months.
A clinically meaningful reduction of 50% of biochemical markers of bone resorption was observed as early as one month after start of treatment with ibandronic acid 2.5mg.
Following treatment discontinuation, there is a reversion to the pathological pre-treatment rates of elevated bone resorption associated with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The histological analysis of bone biopsies after two and three years of treatment of postmenopausal women showed bone of normal quality and no indication of a mineralisation defect.
Paediatric population (see section 4.2 and section 5.2)
Ibandronic acid was not studied in the paediatric population, therefore no efficacy or safety data are available for this patient population.